Article Emma Jenkin Article Emma Jenkin

Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task

James Campbell: In this MIT study they monitored (through EEG monitors) the neural engagement of groups of students in essay writing tasks. Some were allowed to use AI LLM's (large language models like ChatGPT), some were only allowed to use a search engine, some were "brain only" and others were asked to move from one mode to another. The study found that "cognitive activity scaled down in relation to external tool use" and that "LLM users consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic, and behavioral levels" over the course of the 4 month study.

Read article
Read More
Article Emma Jenkin Article Emma Jenkin

Students Hate Them. Universities Need Them. The Only Real Solution to the A.I. Cheating Crisis.

Rebecca Levere: Some sobering advice from the Vice Provost at NYU responsible for helping faculty and students adapt to digital tools. A couple of passages that stood out to me:

“Our A.I. strategy had assumed that encouraging engaged uses of A.I. — telling students they could use software like ChatGPT to generate practice tests to quiz themselves, explore new ideas or solicit feedback — would persuade students to forgo the lazy uses. It did not.

We cannot simply redesign our assignments to prevent lazy A.I. use. (We’ve tried.) If you ask students to use A.I. but critique what it spits out, they can generate the critique with A.I. If you give them A.I. tutors trained only to guide them, they can still use tools that just supply the answers. And detectors are too prone to false accusations of cheating and too poor at catching lightly edited output for professors to rely on them.”

(And tldr: The ‘hated but only real solution’ to the AI cheating crisis: have students write or speak in front of you, without tech.)

Read article
Read More
Article Emma Jenkin Article Emma Jenkin

Stanford University’s Generative AI for Education Hub Research Study Repository

Unsure if your use of GenAI is backed by the peer-reviewed literature? Why not test your lesson idea against 700 vetted papers in the Research Study Repository of Stanford University’s Generative AI for Education Hub. Go to ChatGPT and enter a prompt along the lines of  “...our school is struggling with middle school math outcomes. What does the Research Study Repository at Stanford’s GenAI in Education Hub’s say around GenAI tools that teachers can use to enhance numeracy skills among middle school students?”. 

Visit Research Study Repository
Read More